I have two questions when I compute source space connectivity.
(1) Is mne.connectivity.spectral_connectivity designed for stimulus-evoked data ?(Because I notice that the example data was stimulus-evoked.)
(2) I want to know whether the connectivity was changed over time. Can I compute the connectivity under different time window (eg: 100-150ms, 150-200ms after stimulus onset). Is it reasonable?
calculating phase connectivity across trials that is- wPLI is calculated from the phase angle difference distributions at a particular point across trials
or is one or both often calculating phase angle differences from multiple points across the time from within each trial that is wPLI across time?
I have two questions when I compute source space connectivity.
(1) Is mne.connectivity.spectral_connectivity designed for stimulus-evoked data ?(Because I notice that the example data was stimulus-evoked.)
(2) I want to know whether the connectivity was changed over time. Can I compute the connectivity under different time window (eg: 100-150ms, 150-200ms after stimulus onset). Is it reasonable?
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Mne_analysis mailing list
Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
no all is computed across trials. When using a continuous Morlet Wavelet
the cross-spectral density matrix is time-resolved but the same metrics can
be computed. You always consume the trials dimensions in both case,
irrespective of the connectivity metric.
Yes I can compute time-frequency connectivity to get time resolved connectivity.
While I still have a more general question. When computing connectivity for band/time containing the evoked response, the result reflects true connectivity but also artifactual connectivity driven by evoke response of stimuli(eg: visual stimuli). For example, if there is time delay between the evoke response of two independent areas (A and B), the spurious connectivity between these A and B will be revealed. So in some studies, people remove evoked response from data before calculating the connectivity. But in examples in MNE-python, is there any consideration about this point?