Hi all,
I have eeg dataset for 10 subjects. The subjects do the same tasks. I
applied the common spatial patterns from mne-python package. I used
with CSP the following algorithms (logistic regression, svc with
linear kernel,).
I wanted to compare the algorithms. I found that, for some subjects
the Logistic Regression performed better, for other subjects the SVC
with linear Kernel performed better.
I have following questions:
for the same tasks is it normal that the optimal algorithm differs
from subject to another?
Is it normal that the CSP patterns are totally different from subject
to another? Why? Is there a literature for this?
Hi all,
I have eeg dataset for 10 subjects. The subjects do the same tasks. I
applied the common spatial patterns from mne-python package. I used
with CSP the following algorithms (logistic regression, svc with
linear kernel,).
I wanted to compare the algorithms. I found that, for some subjects
the Logistic Regression performed better, for other subjects the SVC
with linear Kernel performed better.
I have following questions:
for the same tasks is it normal that the optimal algorithm differs
from subject to another?
linear svm with hinge square loss and logistic regression are likely to
provide very similar solutions. So it's likely that they'll randomly be
better for some subjects over other. Some work by Cichy et al suggest that
SVM may be slightly ore robust, but they havent tried it with CSP
Is it normal that the CSP patterns are totally different from subject
to another? Why? Is there a literature for this?
Subjects topographies, whether taken from CSP or other types of analyses
can vastly differ between subjects because of anatomical differences.
Kindest regards,
JR
_______________________________________________
Mne_analysis mailing list
Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Mne_analysis Info Page