Now that it’s in the public API it’s probably worth keeping there. Especially since people could potentially have legitimate use cases where they want to write their own BIDS-filename-formatted data, or even don’t care about the BIDS-ness but prefer how the BIDS option operates. To me we should just update the docs to say what the option will actually do, and note that it’s there primarily for compat with MNE-BIDS. I don’t think we should check BIDS path validity in MNE-Python.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best practice for joining split, but non-compliantly named fif files | 3 | 812 | February 16, 2021 | |
| Naming convention in mne vs. mne-bids: welcome to the thunderdome (?) | 6 | 706 | January 15, 2021 | |
| mne-bids structure - one subject is different | 13 | 635 | October 16, 2022 | |
| mne-bids: modifying .ds directory name in BIDS dataset | 2 | 118 | December 20, 2023 | |
| write_raw_bids does not rename all data files of the .ds folder | 4 | 182 | February 29, 2024 |