# mne\_average\_estimates

**URL:** <https://mne.discourse.group/t/mne-average-estimates/84>\
**Category:** Mailing List Archive (read-only)\
**Tags:** list-archive\
**Created:** [January 12, 2009, 1:39am UTC](https://mne.discourse.group/t/mne-average-estimates/84 "2009-01-12T01:39:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/mne/original/1X/85cc6bd2b69cb698a166dc6d880fb550510d0144.jpeg) [@system](https://mne.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2009, 1:39am UTC](https://mne.discourse.group/t/mne-average-estimates/84/1 "2009-01-12T01:39:44Z")

</div>

Hello,

I'm trying to use mne\_average\_estimates. I created the stc files using  
mne\_make\_movie and the --morph tag, so according to the manual, I should not  
have a problem with different numbers of vertices:

Note: mne\_average\_estimates requires that the number of vertices in the

> 

stc ?les are the same and that the vertex numbers are identical. This will

> 

be the case if the ?les have been produced in mne\_make\_movie using the

> 

--morph option.

> 

However, running the command results in:

Checking data...[failed] Number of vertices mismatch in

> 3-COMB/meg/3\_grandave

The exact syntax I used for mne\_make\_movie is as below, repeated for each  
subject, all morphed to 4-COMB:

> mne\_make\_movie --inv 10-COMB/meg/10\_grandave-meg-inv.fif --meas  
> 10-COMB/meg/CA10\_grandave.fif --tmin -100 --tmax 500 --tstep 1 --spm  
> --signed --pickupnormalcomp --subject 10-COMB --morph 4-COMB --smooth 4  
> --stc 10-COMB/meg/10-COMB.stc

Subject 3 seems to the be the only one with a mismatch.  
Any help either identifying the source of the problem, or somehow fixing it,  
would be much appreciated.

Linnaea

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/mne/original/1X/85cc6bd2b69cb698a166dc6d880fb550510d0144.jpeg) [@system](https://mne.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2009, 2:24am UTC](https://mne.discourse.group/t/mne-average-estimates/84/2 "2009-01-12T02:24:25Z")

</div>

Hi Linnaea,
